https://netmaker.org logo
Powered by
welcome
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 1:22 PM
    @here v0.5 is LIVE!!!
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 1:22 PM
    Major update: External Clients: Now, any WireGuard enabled device can hook into you network
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 1:22 PM
    opens up a whole slew of new use cases
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 1:22 PM
    Check out the reddit posts, and please upvote for visibility
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 1:22 PM
    https://www.reddit.com/r/WireGuard/comments/nrd6yo/netmaker_v05_support_for_most_devices_windows_mac/ https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxadmin/comments/nrd5ur/netmaker_v05_manage_mesh_wireguard_linux_server/ https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/nrczhd/netmaker_v05_external_clients_and_secure_grpc/ https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/nrcv23/netmaker_v05_support_for_most_devices_windows_mac/
  • g

    gray-caravan-67799

    06/03/2021, 2:41 PM
    @User I assume the bridge needs to be an external address? And if so are we losing that p2p bandwidth in this scenario?
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 2:46 PM
    Yup, it’s gotta use an extra hop so gotta be aware of that
  • g

    gray-caravan-67799

    06/03/2021, 2:51 PM
    here's a question, have yall screwed around with 1 way bridges? ie I was wondering about my cgnat problem, thinking if at least one side of the connection can reach the other, can we ride that tunnel back? you've got 1 double NAT'd device and 1 single NAT'd device. I don't know enough about the handshake to know whether or not if the double nat'd device can reach the single nat, can we maintain connection from 1 side
  • s

    straight-lock-3524

    06/03/2021, 2:53 PM
    @User maybe just what I need then! 😄
  • s

    straight-lock-3524

    06/03/2021, 2:54 PM
    as I liked the solution pretty much between servers but I need for example a mac client as well
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 3:05 PM
    @User yup, that's exactly the intended use case. Set up a private network with linux servers, but allow client devices to plug into it.
  • s

    straight-lock-3524

    06/03/2021, 3:07 PM
    nice 🙂
  • s

    straight-lock-3524

    06/03/2021, 3:07 PM
    as after yours I tried solutions like tailscale and such but in terms of performance they either are not that easy or cost money
  • s

    straight-lock-3524

    06/03/2021, 3:08 PM
    or lower performance
  • s

    straight-lock-3524

    06/03/2021, 3:10 PM
    updating is also described there?
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 4:19 PM
    We're not really handling an update process at this point, probably not till we get to 1.0
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 4:19 PM
    for the server you can try just doing docker-compose down and using the new docker compose in place
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 4:20 PM
    it should pick up the mongo DB, but we made some schema changes so not sure what kind of compatibility it will get...should mostly work
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 4:20 PM
    on the agent side idk either...may be able to just replace the agents with the new ones, but the systemd script needs to be modified because the syntax for the cli changed
  • m

    melodic-ghost-17087

    06/03/2021, 4:40 PM
    so I've got my synology running all my docker containers.. I used to run openvpn on my pfsense router and use that to tunnel home and then get out to the internet and my home stuff.
  • m

    melodic-ghost-17087

    06/03/2021, 4:41 PM
    so... in using netmaker and wg, I'd install netmaker in my docker instance and I'd be able to bring in my droplet as a gateway and ingress through that?
  • m

    melodic-ghost-17087

    06/03/2021, 4:42 PM
    or would I want to install my netmaker instance into one of my cloud servers and have that orchestrate?
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 5:20 PM
    running netmaker currently requires host privileges in docker because it's running kernel wireguard. If you can do host mounts and run privileged then you can do it that way. However, if you're using a LB to all your docker containers, you also have to keep in mind that the nodes communicate over GRPC which may not be handled by default on your LB
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/03/2021, 5:20 PM
    TL;DR, cloud server is easier
  • s

    straight-lock-3524

    06/03/2021, 5:45 PM
    I’ll just reinstall everything lol
  • m

    melodic-ghost-17087

    06/04/2021, 3:03 AM
    your docker-compose slim is targeting v0.3 is that a typo?
  • s

    straight-lock-3524

    06/04/2021, 9:30 AM
    I would gues that indeed being a typo
  • j

    jolly-london-20127

    06/04/2021, 4:02 PM
    Yup, sorry guys, we’re having some issues getting the docs updated so a lot of the info is still relevant to 0.3.5
  • u

    user

    08/11/2021, 9:43 PM
    Whats up with the site?
1...456...74Latest