netmaker
- n
narrow-flag-53296
04/25/2021, 9:58 PM@straight-lock-3524 depends on where you want to hook it from - g
gray-caravan-67799
04/25/2021, 9:58 PMI'm gonna have to go check that out - n
narrow-flag-53296
04/25/2021, 9:58 PMGnunet is baller - g
gray-caravan-67799
04/25/2021, 9:58 PMpfff GNS.... they would - n
narrow-flag-53296
04/25/2021, 9:59 PMThey just keep breaking it while building it lol - n
narrow-flag-53296
04/25/2021, 9:59 PMLol GNS from the gnu people - n
narrow-flag-53296
04/25/2021, 9:59 PMIS THIS FOSS ENOUGH FOR YOU - so says the ram - s
straight-lock-3524
04/25/2021, 10:00 PMlol - n
narrow-flag-53296
04/25/2021, 10:02 PM@straight-lock-3524 if it’s a local node you login with the Linux node. Add two interfaces. One for netmaker and one for your network for non netmaker nodes - n
narrow-flag-53296
04/25/2021, 10:02 PMPut a dhcp server on the interface for ones not on the netmaker network and add a static route - n
narrow-flag-53296
04/25/2021, 10:04 PMEg the computer you want to connect to the netmaker network isn’t Linux but in the same L1 space as the node that is connected to the netmaker network - s
straight-lock-3524
04/25/2021, 10:18 PMhmm smart - j
jolly-london-20127
04/28/2021, 3:40 AMpretty cool stuff today, should have ipv6 and private dns working very soon - j
jolly-london-20127
05/06/2021, 3:03 PMv0.3 is now live! New features: - Private DNS Management using CoreDNS - Dual Stack IPv6 Support - j
jolly-london-20127
05/06/2021, 3:03 PMCheck out the post here: https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/n695ci/netmaker_v03_private_dns_using_coredns_and_dual/ - j
jolly-london-20127
05/08/2021, 8:11 PMHi @here, wanted to give you all the general goals for the next few weeks and get some input. #1 is I'd like to cut a 0.3.5 branch by end of next week that improves stability, install, and documentation. After seeing all the problems people had installing, that's definitely necessary. If you encounter any issues while setting up, please post about it in #825086359185260554 or better yet, create an issue on GitHub. - j
jolly-london-20127
05/08/2021, 8:13 PM#2 is within the next few weeks I'd like to release v0.4. The idea for the major enhancement is to introduce the concept of "inlets", which are just gateways into any of your virtual networks for non meshed clients. The benefit here is, we can add network access for any wireguard-enabled machine (Windows, Mac, Phones) without having to create a custom agent. - j
jolly-london-20127
05/08/2021, 8:14 PMAs an example, you create a network of servers called "myoffice" on 10.10.10.0/24. One of these nodes has a public IP and is enabled as an "inlet". It gets an additional interface and acts as a gateway for any machine you'd like to grant access to the office network. On top of that, we would have a tool for managing remove clients. Now here is the big question for you guys. - j
jolly-london-20127
05/08/2021, 8:16 PMIdeally, we would just integrate with existing WireGuard config/peer management tools. For a standard VPN, this problem is largely solved, it's just a gateway to the internet instead of to a particular subnet. Examples: - https://github.com/ngoduykhanh/wireguard-ui - https://github.com/subspacecloud/subspace - https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/wg-ui - https://github.com/donaldzou/wireguard-dashboard - j
jolly-london-20127
05/08/2021, 8:17 PMOnly thing is, we'd need to be able to modify routing rules, and manage multiple wireguard interfaces, so the tool needs to support that. This is where I'd like your feedback. If you know an existing tool that might be a good fit for this use case, please let me know. - s
straight-lock-3524
05/08/2021, 8:20 PMso then I can use it on my mac as well lol? - j
jolly-london-20127
05/08/2021, 8:21 PMYes exactly. Nodes would not be able to reach your mac, but your mac could access the network, which I believe is sufficient for 80%+ of use cases involving Mac, Windows, and Phones. They typically only need to reach into the network. - s
straight-lock-3524
05/08/2021, 8:24 PMyup lol - r
red-florist-82916
05/08/2021, 8:57 PMExciting :) - n
narrow-flag-53296
05/08/2021, 10:59 PM@User you already know about the tools, you just don't wanna use them lmao - n
narrow-flag-53296
05/08/2021, 10:59 PM - n
narrow-flag-53296
05/08/2021, 11:00 PMgnunet solves this problem with onion routing (yay, obscure techniques!) - j
jolly-london-20127
05/08/2021, 11:50 PMHow does that solve for managing clients on different OS’s? Even in that link it only talks about linux distros. I don't see how this is relevant to handling non-linux clients. - n
narrow-flag-53296
05/09/2021, 2:38 AMit uses pre-existing technology stacks that you can use without creating a third party client - j
jolly-london-20127
05/11/2021, 1:57 PM